Description: Implement disaster recovery at the storage level by re-instantiating virtual servers at a remote data center after a disasterRisk Components: Complexity, dependence on SAN/NAS replication
Next Inflection: Medium Risk/early adopter in 24-36 months
Expected ROI: 12 months
Pitfalls: SAN/NAS replication is complex. Not enough physical servers in recovery site to maintain adequate performance. Demand/replication spike during disaster
Vendors: Microsoft, SWSoft, VMWare, Virtual Iron, XenSource
New Skills: SAN or NAS replication; continuous data protection; managing virtual machines and physical machines in a mixed environment
Related Technologies: SAN, NAS, blade servers, provisioning software, patch management, global server load balancing; WAN routing and optimization
Order Solution Briefing Paper “Disaster Recovery with Virtual Machines” for additional information such as:
Full analysis of the solution ROI/TCO calculations Best practices and recommendations Pitfalls Vendor ratings and feature matrix Skills and training requirements Peer recommendations Case studiesContact sales@nemertes.com [2] for more information.
Links:
[1] http://www.nemertes.com/data_center_2006_charts/risk_level_4
[2] mailto:sales@nemertes.com